I came across this in the Guardian.
I am only an amateur astrologer, but this analysis seemed especially amateurish itself. First reason: Sun Signs. Typically I write someone off right there, but I’ve learned not to do that, just to be nice and for the sake of curiosity. Then I hit ctrl+f and typed in “Moon”. Nothing. Thus, what we are looking at is an attempt at mundane astrology without a single mention of the Moon. Strikes me as odd.
The image is that the Moon draws down to Earth what happens above. The Moon is taken as a bridge. It is the nearest and the fastest. Electional and mundane astrology, as I understand, can not be done without reference to the moon. It seems what we have here is a case of the modern astrologer looking for any kind of connection whatsoever and running with it.
The third reason and the strongest: the astrologer in the article claims that Mars will be in Aquarius on Election Day. That’s not entirely false, but very nearly. Mars does move into Aquarius on November 8th, but not until 9 minutes to midnight. Christopher Renstrom gets an extra hour for being in Salt Lake City, sure, but most people will not be voting at that time. 10:51 pm is not the time we should be looking at.
The moment the results are announced are not the proper moment to be looking at anyway, symbolically speaking, though I doubt Mr. Renstrom even considered that. The moment the results are announced is the symbolic moment for the people’s relationship to the announcement of the next president. It is nearly a symbolic moment for the presidency, but the inauguration is much more useful for that.
My point just now is that Mr. Renstrom shamelessly moved the data to fit his theory. He practically lied when he said Mars will be in Aquarius on Election Day.
Now that I’ve spent all of this time talking about it, what time do we look at? Given that there is no one time that everyone will be voting, unless we have a good guess about when most of them will, which may not be useful anyway, probably the most fruitful thing to do would be to take a look at a Sunrise chart. If you need an explanation for that, the Sunrise chart is like the natal chart for the whole day. The houses are like a symbolic imprint of the Sunrise upon the sky. Think about that for a moment. I hope it becomes clear. If not, just recognize that it’s standard procedure when there is no exact time for an event. I do assert again that there is no exact time for this event.
Okay. Sunrise over where? The proper symbolic location would be Washington, D.C., would it not?
Here it is.
I’ll first just give a quick overview of my method and what I’m showing you, as this is my first post on the subject. Keep in mind that I am 100% self taught.
On the outside of the big wheel are the twelve sections of the ecliptic named for constellations and created by the seasons. This is the tropical zodiac. Cancer is the summer solstice. Capricorn is the winter solstice. Aries and Libra the equinoxes, spring and autumn respectively.
Just inside that is another ring. Those are the terms. I won’t explain them here. We can also see the wheel is divided by twelve in another way. The lines radiating from the center of the circle demarcate the houses. The zodiac relates to the year just as the houses relate to the day. The houses are like the zodiac of the day, and they are the reason it is so important for an astrologer to have an exact time for the event he or she is looking at, in most cases the time of birth.
Within the houses are the planets. I primarily use the traditional septenary of planets — everything up to Saturn, which can be seen without a telescope — but I think it’s a huge mistake to disregard the others entirely. Ceres and Eris are in here as well simply because I feel that they are significant, even though I don’t quite know what to make of them yet. I do feel that most astrologers who have used Ceres in their charts have done so incorrectly; they just fail to understand her. Sedna is in there just for kicks. I usually never include Sedna and you will hear nothing about her here.
I do use only the five Ptolemaic aspects. What David Cochrane gets from his efforts, if anything, will not be what he set out to find.
One last thing, just to give you a look. These are most of the other pieces of information I look to when interpreting a chart:
Very quickly. Planets and houses, positions, non-Ptolemaic essential dignities, planets’ distances from the ecliptic, planets’ speeds relative to average, and antiscia. Chain of disposition and chain of detriment are a bit like the chain of command among the planets, which changes continually. These charts given by the program are simplified but definitely useful.
Okay. Now, let’s do what Mr. Renstrom did and look at the chart for New Hampshire for today, the Primary.
Here, the Sun is in very poor condition and afflicted by a strong Mars. A very strong Mars. Second, I’ll point out that the Moon is just barely past new, but essentially lost, and applying to Neptune by way of Ceres, weakened by proximity to the Sun.
Mars is in charge in this chart, in the ninth house, the house of philosophy, lording over Mercury, Venus, and Pluto. Mercury, in turn, rules over a Jupiter in very poor condition, except for his conjunction with the north node, and his strong placement in an angular house.
The Uranus-Pluto square continues on top of Mercury and Venus.
Now, let’s return to election day. This is examining the claim that whoever wins New Hampshire wins the election.
The first thing to look at is the Moon. She is just past waxing quarter at the Immum Coeli, in friendly aspect to Venus, Uranus, Ceres, and Eris. Uranus, Ceres, and Eris are united just there. Make of it what you will because I won’t.
Mars is again in good strength but essentially impotent. He’s shouting and boasting but no one hears him. No one cares. It is notable that he characterizes matters of communication in this chart.
The most interesting thing here is the mutual reception between Jupiter and Saturn. Jupiter is Saturn’s supporter and doesn’t understand it but moves along joyfully anyway:
Tradition walks through growth, which enthusiastically, if clumsily, works on behalf of this tradition and the greater public.
Mercury is in poor condition, at odds with the Moon, who is only accidentally in a strong position.
The Moon seeks to bring the conversation to foundations, families, wealth that doesn’t come in the form of coins or numbers in the computer, however, those are not necessarily things to be absent — this very probably is still referring to material wealth.
The conversation is brought to an understanding of the difficult, ugly, uncomfortable things that need to be done — that need to be done — and the many changes of many kinds required of them. Uranus is exactly on the cusp of the house that rules manual labor as well as illness. As I see it, the sixth house in the context of mundane astrology is always a good indicator of the working class. It is an indication of those who work hard in poor conditions doing things no one else would like to do.
The Sun, the central figure of the whole ordeal, is regarded positively by forces of upheaval.
Back to the primary. A short, simple analysis:
Enemies of the authority work openly and in secret to forcefully confront it with powerful ideas in cooperation with the forces that have already long been in play to disrupt and overturn. The election characterizes the working class as weakened, but with greater than expected strength, moving by necessity toward a nebulous ideal.
Condense the message of Election Day:
Tradition walks through growth, which enthusiastically, if clumsily, works on behalf of this tradition and the greater public. The conversation is brought to families and material wealth as it relates to difficult, ugly, uncomfortable things that must be done and the many changes required of them, with an emphasis on the needs of working class. That which is in power has potential to be overturned easily, or possibly will easily overturn.
These were the two messages I was able to interpret the charts. I don’t see a clear connection, not only in the messages, but in the structure of the charts themselves, which Renstrom pretended to have done. Really, Renstrom was just bullshitting everything, so far as I can tell.
Now for the caucuses, for completeness.
The biggest difference here is the Moon, as it’s a difference of only a few days. A powerful idea was felt, as according to the last analysis, though it was poorly expressed, lacking coordination. Here is an indication of having acted immaturely.
I don’t want this post to be too much longer. Later I’ll post charts for each of the candidates as I’m able to find them.
Now, to end, to wrap up this analysis of this article, let’s look at each of Mr. Renstrom’s claims, one by one.
For the New Hampshire primary and election night, “the planets mirror each other, which is really quite surprising,” said Renstrom.
This is the basis for his entire claim. I don’t think he says any other thing but this. Do they mirror each other? For the primary, Mars is in the twentieth degree of Scorpio and the Sun is in the twenty first degree of Aquarius. In November the Sun is in the seventeenth degree of Scorpio and Mars is in the thirtieth degree of Capricorn. That’s a difference of three degrees, and a whopping twenty-two degrees. This is not all that remarkable. I had complained earlier that he hadn’t mentioned the Moon. Yet further, he might have found the Moon’s position in Aquarius, much closer to the Sun’s today, also significant. Not a word of it.
Next: People with a really strong Mars signature will do well.
Hillary very much is not one of them, nor is Rubio. Saying that Rubio’s Mars in Aquarius is astrologically significant is bullshit. Straight up. Mars is strong with Bernie and Cruz, but for neither of them so much as Jeb (but we can’t be sure without Bernie’s birthtime). Trump’s Mars is very weak. But there’s no point to considering any of this in this context because the first claim, that the Sun and Mars mirror each other, is wrong and would not be particularly important if it were true. Remember, Mars is unaspected on Election Day. Mars will not be calling the shots then.
Now my favorite. That Jupiter moving through Virgo is good for Bernie because he’s a Virgo.
First, he is not a Virgo. His Sun is in Virgo. Here’s another way of looking at it, assuming that the birth time guess I got from astrodienst is correct (It’s probably not): Jupiter has moved through his ninth house, emphasizing his philosophy and extending his reach and his voice. Then it moves on to the midheaven and his north node, with the north node during a nodal return, during the New Hampshire primary. It only gets better from there as Jupiter even touches on the significator for his career, and then does the exact same thing into his eleventh house when Jupiter takes a special focus on the wider population. How about that?
The only thing Renstrom really gets right, though, is Cruz’s strong birth potential for economic disaster, and not just for himself. It seems clear enough to me.
Okay. Last but not least. Prepare yourself. This one is really bad.
Seriously, it will hurt if you know anything about astrology. So brace yourself for the stupid.
‘Who’s going to win come November? The planets vote Clinton.’
“The presidential election takes place when the sun is in Scorpio.”
W. T. F…
It hurts. It hurts so much.
Renstrom is so full of shit.